Summary
A longitudinal study on the extension of the Prosecco Geographical Indication (GI) reveals that tensions between incumbents and newcomers can be effectively managed through political agency, governance mechanisms, and a territorial portfolio strategy. The research finds that while extensions of GIs increase beneficiaries, they also spark conflicts rooted in differing visions of the GI's identity and boundaries. By analyzing the Prosecco extension process, the study provides actionable insights for policymakers and practitioners to navigate such contestations, offering a framework for balancing economic gains with territorial cohesion.
Citation
Checchinato, F., Finotto, V., Mauracher, C., & Rinaldi, C. (2024). Spreading the gains from geographical indications: A longitudinal study on the extension of the Prosecco GI. Journal of Rural Studies, 109, 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103336