Point cloud vs drawing on archaeological site

A comparative analysis of traditional archaeological documentation methods and modern three-dimensional acquisition techniques, such as laser scanning and photogrammetry, reveals that while both approaches are effective, the latter offers significant time-saving benefits without compromising data quality. The study, conducted at Saint Hilarion Monastery in the Gaza Strip, demonstrates that systematic photogrammetric documentation of stratigraphic layers can replace conventional drawing methods during excavations, particularly in preventive archaeology where time constraints are critical. However, it also highlights potential risks associated with incorrect photogrammetry practices and underscores the need for standardized monitoring protocols to ensure accurate data collection. This research suggests a shift towards integrating advanced acquisition techniques into mainstream archaeological practice, balancing efficiency with scientific rigor.

Alby, E. (2015). Point cloud vs drawing on archaeological site. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-5/W7, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-w7-7-2015