Egalitarian nationhoods: a political theory in defence of the voice to parliament in the Uluru Statement from the Heart

A political theory of 'egalitarian nationhoods' challenges objections to the Uluru Statement from the Heart's proposed Voice to Parliament, arguing that it does not create privilege but instead ensures equality and self-determination for First Nations peoples. The 2017 statement called for a constitutionally enshrined Voice, alongside a Makarrata Commission for treaty-making and truth-telling, recommendations rejected by successive Australian governments. Drawing on Chaim Gans' theory of egalitarian Zionism, this study reframes the debate, asserting that the Voice aligns with principles non-Indigenous Australians take for granted—collective rights and self-determination—rather than granting special privileges. The research employs theoretical analysis to counter misconceptions about the Voice's impact on Australia's bicameral system or its potential to divide the nation.

Hobbs, H., & Jones, B. T. (2022). Egalitarian nationhoods: a political theory in defence of the voice to parliament in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Australian Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2022.2028720