The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Using good and Cooperative Governance to improve Environmental Governance of South African World Heritage sites: A Case Study of the Vredefort Dome


World Heritage Site: Vredefort Dome

Publication Year: 2017

Publication Type: Article

Publication Identifier: WHEC17EDE477C

Summary

Fragmented environmental governance of South African World Heritage Sites (WHS) undermines sustainability, but cooperative and good governance strategies can effectively address these challenges. A case study of the Vredefort Dome reveals that current governance frameworks, despite their complexity involving multiple legislative and institutional structures, fail to ensure cohesive and sustainable management. The research proposes actionable strategies—such as strengthened inter-agency collaboration, clearer regulatory alignment, and community engagement—to overcome fragmentation and enhance environmental stewardship. By integrating principles of good and cooperative governance, this study offers a blueprint for improving WHS conservation outcomes in South Africa.

Citation

Kotzé, L., & De la Harpe, S. (2017). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Using good and Cooperative Governance to improve Environmental Governance of South African World Heritage sites: A Case Study of the Vredefort Dome. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 11(2), 201–254. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2008/v11i2a2763

You are here:
World Heritage Explorer > World Heritage Research > Publications > The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Using good and Cooperative Governance to improve Environmental Governance of South African World Heritage sites: A Case Study of the Vredefort Dome

This website includes data sources licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Additional original content by World Heritage Explorer, also licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. WHE is not affiliated with UNESCO or the World Heritage Committee. Legal Notice. Privacy Policy.

Open Data for an Open World