Response to rebuttal by Grima et al. elaborating on misleading conclusion in paper on “Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols at Hagar Qim-A Pilot Study” concerning salt decay after sheltering an archaeological site in Malta


World Heritage Site: Megalithic Temples of Malta

Publication Year: 2018

Publication Type: Article

Publication Identifier: WHEC3E8901F26

Summary

A decade after installing shelters over three of Malta's Megalithic Temples, researchers assess the effectiveness and implications of these structures. The study provides a balanced review of existing research on shelter performance, highlighting preliminary findings while scrutinizing their validity. It identifies gaps in current knowledge regarding the impact of shelters on salt decay—a significant threat to archaeological sites exposed to sea salt aerosols. The research combines literature analysis with critical evaluation, offering insights that could guide conservation efforts for similar heritage sites worldwide.

Citation

Cassar, J., Cefai, S., Grima, R., & Stroud, K. (2018). Response to rebuttal by Grima et al. elaborating on misleading conclusion in paper on “Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols at Hagar Qim-A Pilot Study” concerning salt decay after sheltering an archaeological site in Malta. Heritage Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0237-7

You are here:
World Heritage Explorer > World Heritage Research > Publications > Response to rebuttal by Grima et al. elaborating on misleading conclusion in paper on “Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols at Hagar Qim-A Pilot Study” concerning salt decay after sheltering an archaeological site in Malta

This website includes data sources licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Additional original content by World Heritage Explorer, also licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. WHE is not affiliated with UNESCO or the World Heritage Committee. Legal Notice. Privacy Policy.

Open Data for an Open World