How objective are protected area management effectiveness assessments? A case study from the iSimangaliso Wetland Park

Protected area management effectiveness assessments, designed to improve conservation practices and reporting, often yield inconsistent results due to variations in methodology. A case study of the iSimangaliso Wetland Park revealed significant discrepancies between national and provincial assessments, with scores differing based on spatial detail, management hierarchy consultation depth, time allocation, and peer review rigor. The study highlights the need for standardized operating procedures to ensure credibility and robustness in these evaluations. Recommendations include clear guidelines for participant involvement, sufficient time for peer review, and adherence to best practices to maintain an accurate representation of on-the-ground conditions.

Carbutt, C., & Goodman, P. S. (2013). How objective are protected area management effectiveness assessments? A case study from the iSimangaliso Wetland Park. Koedoe, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1110