Cluny and Vézelay. The Paradox of the Romanesque Capital in Burgundy

Romanesque capitals, often presumed to carry deep narrative or symbolic meaning, are found to serve primarily decorative purposes. This study challenges the tendency to over-interpret their subject matter by examining two great Cluniac churches—Cluny and Vézelay—as case studies. It highlights the subordinate role of capitals in relation to principal sanctuary images and raises unanswered questions about their connection to liturgical celebrations, the rarity of narrative sequences, and the understanding of lost paintings and altars during construction. The research relies on written evidence, such as that from Lucas of Tuy, to argue against over-interpretation while acknowledging lingering uncertainties.

Stratford, N. (2019). Cluny and Vézelay. The Paradox of the Romanesque Capital in Burgundy. Revue Mabillon, 30, 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1484/j.rm.5.120418